DID YOU KNOW A THIRD BUILDING FELL ON 9/11?

Not just any building…a 610-foot-tall, 47-story, steel-framed high-rise, known as World Trade Center Building 7.

This building...

Unlike the Twin Towers, Building 7 was not hit by a plane.  In fact, it was 370 feet away from the closest of the Twin Towers, but at 5:20 pm that afternoon it simply collapsed in near perfect symmetry at free-fall acceleration.

After being forced by public pressure to investigate what clearly appeared to be controlled demolition, the National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST") claimed the collapse was simply “due to normal office fires” and refused to acknowledge Building 7 fell at free-fall acceleration.  It wasn't until high school physics teacher David Chandler used basic science to prove free-fall acceleration that NIST finally conceded to that fact.

To truly appreciate the importance of this, hold any object out in front of you and let it drop.  The fact that an enormous structure like Building 7 literally dropped in this manner is not only extraordinary, it is unprecedented.  In the history of high-rise construction, not a single steel-framed building has ever collapsed due to fire, much less at free-fall acceleration and in near perfect symmetry.  For this to have happened to Building 7, some of the most basic laws of physics (Newton's Law of Motion) prove beyond question that all support columns had to be removed simultaneously. The only event that can explain this is CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

For NIST, an agency filled with scientific and technical subject matter experts, to claim this collapse was caused by normal office fires is a blatant and preposterous lie.

In direct contradiction to NIST’s claim, multiple recordings and eyewitness testimonies exist in which fire department “authorities” stated they were going to bring Building 7 down because it was unstable.  There are also numerous recordings of loud explosions just prior to its collapse, and the deliberate demolition of Building 7 was later confirmed during a 2004 PBS interview in which World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein said, "the fire department made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse."  The glaring problem with this statement is that controlled demolition of even small buildings requires weeks of careful planning and physical preparation by trained experts.  For the fire department, or even professional demolition experts, to claim they were going to bring down Building 7 with only one afternoon of planning and preparation (and while the building was still on fire, no less) is also a blatant and preposterous lie.

The inescapable conclusion is that Building 7 was indeed brought down by controlled demolition, but it had to be planned and prepared far in advance of 9/11.  The only question is who could have done this, and the disturbing answer lies squarely in the hands of some of the tenants who occupied Building 7 at the time.  They included Rudy Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management and the CIA.  In fact, Building 7 housed the largest CIA field office in the country, making it one of the most highly secured buildings in the entire country.  Installing enough precisely placed explosives to bring that building down would have been impossible without the complicity of those who controlled access to the building’s most sensitive areas.  Without question, that authority would have ultimately belonged to the CIA.

If you are one of the countless Americans who simply finds it too hard to believe that members of the U.S. government could have played a role in 9/11, then the following is your wakeup call.  In 1962, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff proposed a plan to President Kennedy that was intended to galvanize American support for an invasion of Cuba.  In this diabolical plan, known as "Operation Northwoods", the heads of every branch of the U.S. armed forces gave their unanimous written consent to sink U.S. ships, shoot down hijacked American planes, and gun down and bomb civilians on the streets of Washington, D.C. and Miami, all under the pretense of Cuban-sponsored acts of terrorism.  President Kennedy rejected their sinister plan and, not surprisingly, he was assassinated the following year by a supposed Cuban communist.  The American public only learned of Operation Northwoods years later when it was declassified by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board.  That plan, which offers an almost precise analogue to the events of 9/11, can be read at George Washington University’s National Security Archive: Operation Northwoods.

Disturbed that the U.S. government's investigation of 9/11 was so corrupted with egregious omissions, fabrications, and contradictions, and most especially by NIST’s absurd dismissal of Newton’s Laws of Motion, in 2006 a group of professional architects, engineers, and scientists began analyzing physical evidence collected from the World Trade Center debris.  Their research quickly revealed that the collapse of Building 7 was the result of controlled demolition involving Nano-Thermite, a sophisticated military incendiary developed and manufactured exclusively for the U.S. government by federal research facilities, DoD & DHS contractors, prestigious universities, and most interestingly, NIST itself.  This organization, known as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), includes over 3,000 highly educated and experienced subject matter experts and over 22,000 citizens who are calling for a new and verifiably independent investigation of 9/11.  Most recently, New York area fire commissioners made history by publicly joining this call for a new investigation, and a four-year research study by the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks proved conclusively that fire did not bring down World Trade Center Building 7.

While the news media have routinely mocked these professionals as "conspiracy theorists" and dismissed their scientific findings without review, that should come as no surprise.  It is public knowledge that mainstream news media have been infiltrated and compromised by government intelligence agencies for many years, and they are now clearly complicit in helping promote official government narratives that keep the American people ignorant to the truth.  As a result, to this day a large percentage of Americans still have never even heard of Building 7.

With the exception of the brave and conscientious members of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, you also won’t find many technical professionals discussing the scientific anomalies of 9/11 either.  Like their fellow Americans, many have also never heard of Building 7.  Those who have most certainly recognized the lie immediately but caved under career pressure, and now offer their silent consent to the government’s official 9/11 narrative.

The incredible boldness of this crime, and the unconscionable betrayal and murder of citizens by members of our own government, makes the truth of 9/11 very difficult to accept.  But once you allow real science to reveal what really happened that day, it doesn't take long for the endless "War on Terror", domestic spying, erosion of civil liberties, and pervasive social media censorship to all make sense.  The picture it paints is much darker than the one we were sold about Muslim terrorists, and the implications are breathtaking.

The consequences of speaking the truth about 9/11 are fast becoming insignificant compared to the consequences of remaining silent, and like the very attacks themselves, silence is treason against truth and justice, and even life itself.

As Martin Luther King, Jr. said:

      “There comes a time when silence is betrayal.”

      “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

      “In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.”

TRUTH and JUSTICE are the cornerstones of valid governments and civilized societies, but they are meaningless without a voice.  For justice to prevail, good people must stand up and speak the truth.  People like you.  Yes, you have a career and a reputation to consider, but you also have a choice to make.  You can allow yourself to be defined by your career ambitions and the opinions of others, or you can choose to define yourself on the basis of your principles, and by having the courage to stand up in their defense.

Will you allow ignorance, apathy, and cowardice to feed the growing tyranny that threatens our democracy and freedom, or will you help shine the light of truth on this terrible darkness and demand the justice that all 9/11 victims and their families deserve?

The following short videos expose the undeniable truth of 9/11.  Educate yourself and then share this critically important truth with others.





If you still have doubts, questions, or you are just ready to become more fully informed about what really happened on 9/11, visit 9-11TruthAndJustice.org.